Novel Biodegradable Elastomeric Scaffold for Tissue Engineering and Light Scattering Fingerprinting Methods for Testing the Same

ABSTRACT

The present invention is directed to a novel biocompatible polymer that may be used in tissue engineering. More specifically, the specification describes methods and compositions for making and using a citric acid copolymers.

BACKGROUND

Some experimental data described herein was generated with the supportof National Institutes of Health training grant R21HL71921-02. Thepresent application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/503,943 filed Sep. 19, 2003 and U.S.patent application Ser. No. 60/556,642, filed Mar. 26, 2004. Each of theforegoing applications are specifically incorporated herein by referencein its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally directed to a substrate used fortissue engineering. The substrate is a biodegradable elastomericpolymer. Methods and compositions for testing and using the same aredisclosed.

BACKGROUND OF THE RELATED ART

The field of tissue engineering has slowly emerged within the past 2decades, driven primarily by the large demand for replacement ofdiseased or damaged tissue [1]. Tissue engineering presents enormouschallenges and opportunities for materials science from the perspectiveof both materials design and materials processing [2]. Successful tissueregeneration must go beyond reproducing shape and structure to restorebiological and mechanical function and long-term integration withsurround native tissues [3]. Tissue engineering requires the use of athree dimensional scaffold for cells to grow and differentiate properly.

Generally, the ideal cell scaffold in tissue engineering should bebiocompatible and biodegradable, promote cellular interaction and tissuedevelopment, and possess proper mechanical and physical properties. Thecell scaffolds are implanted in a mechanically dynamic environment inthe body; the scaffold must sustain and recover from variousdeformations without mechanical irritations to the surrounding tissues.The properties of scaffolds should resemble those of the extracellularmatrix (ECM), a soft, tough, and elastomeric proteinaceous network thatprovides mechanical stability and structural integrity to tissues andorgans [4].

Mechanical stimuli play an important role in the development of tissues.In vascular engineering, for example, the extent to which the initialcompliance may affect the long-term function of the graft remainscontroversial [5]. It has long been realized the fibrous tissueformation within and surrounding and implanted vascular graft wouldcompromise graft compliance. Compliance mismatch between the grafts andhost vessel may contribute to the development of incompleteendothelialization and myointimal hyperplasia at the anastomoticregions. Hence, elastomeric materials are attractive in tissueengineering especially in soft tissue engineering such as vascular,ligament, and meniscus engineering [6].

Current elastomers in tissue engineering can be categorized as naturallyderived materials and synthetic polymers. Naturally derived materialssuch as collagen and elastin must be isolated from human, animal orplant tissue. This process typically results in a high cost and largebatch to batch variations. These materials also exhibit a limited rangeof physical properties and immune response is always a concern [7][8].Typical synthetic elastomeric materials include poly (4-hydroxybutyrate)(P4HB), polyurethane(PU), polycarpolactone (PCL),poly(glycerol-sebacate) (PGS) [4] and so on. PHB has a much highermodulus (stiffer) and much lower sfum to failure compared the normalsoft tissues. PU has been investigated extensively as elastomericmaterials for vascular grafts. One major concern about PU, however, isthe potential carcinogenic effect of its degradation products. Astatement issued by FDA suggested that the implanted PU foam mightdegrade and form 2,4-toluene diamine, which has been shown to causeliver cancer in laboratory animals [6]. PCL is a semi-crystalline linearresorbable aliphatic elastomeric polyester.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a number of medicaland drug delivery devices made by PCL. However, applications of PCLmight be limited because degradation and resorption of PCL areconsiderably slow due to its hydrophobic character and highcrystallinity. The hydrophobic surface also has impacts to the cellattachment on PCL [9]. PGS is a newly developed elastomer which exhibitsgood mechanical properties and biocompatibility. High temperature andhigh vacuum, however, are needed for the polymer synthesis. [10]

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a novel biocompatible elastomericpolymer that may be used in tissue engineering. More specifically, thespecification describes methods and compositions for making and usingcitric acid copolymers. In certain embodiments, there is provided acomposition comprising a citric acid polyester having the genericformula (A-B-C)n, wherein A is a linear aliphatic dihydroxy monomer; Bis citric acid, C is a linear aliphatic dihydroxy monomer, and n is aninteger greater than 1. In specific embodiments, A is a linear diolcomprising between about 2 and about 20 carbons. In other embodiments, Cis independently a linear diol comprising between about 2 and about 20carbons. While in certain embodiments, both A and C may be the samelinear diol, other embodiments contemplate that A and C are differentlinear diols. A particularly preferred linear diol is 1,8, octanediol.In other embodiments, one or both of A and C may be 1,10-decanediol. Thediol also may be an unsaturated diol, e.g.,tetradeca-2,12-diene-1,14-diol, or other diols including macromonomerdiols such as polyethylene oxide, and N-methyldiethanoamine (MDEA). Thisfamily of elastomers is named as poly(diol citrate). In particularlypreferred embodiments, the composition of the invention is dihydroxypoly 1,8-octanediol co-citric acid. Poly(diol citrate) can also formhybrids with other materials like hydroxyapatite to form elastomericcomposites.

Another aspect of the invention contemplates a substrate that may beformulated for tissue culture and/or tissue engineering wherein thesubstrate is made of a citric acid polymer as described herein. Inpreferred embodiments, the substrate may further comprise a surfacemodification that allows cellular attachment. Preferably, the polymer ofthe invention employed as cell/tissue culture substrate isbiodegradable. Preferably, the polymer also is biocompatible. The“biocompatible” is intended to encompass a polymer that may be implantedin vivo or alternatively may be used for the growth of cells that may beimplanted in vivo without producing an adverse reaction, such as animmunological response or otherwise altering the morphology of the cellsgrown thereon to render the cells incompatible with being implanted invivo or used to model an in vivo organ.

Also contemplated herein is a method of producing engineered tissue,comprising providing a biodegradable citric acid polymer of the presentinvention as a scaffold for the growth of cells and culturing cells ofsaid tissue on the scaffold. In preferred methods, the polymer is poly1,8-octanediol-co-citric acid, or a derivative thereof. In specificembodiments, the cells are selected from the group consisting ofendothelial cells, ligament tissue, muscle cells, bone cells, cartilagecells. In other preferred embodiments, the tissue engineering methodcomprises growing the cells on the scaffold in a bioreactor.

Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent fromthe following detailed description. It should be understood, however,that the detailed description and the specific examples, whileindicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way ofillustration only, because various changes and modifications within thespirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilledin the art from this detailed description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the synthesis of poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citric acid)

FIG. 2 is an FTIR spectrum of POC

FIG. 3 is a graph depicting stress-strain curves of POC under differentreaction conditions

FIG. 4 is a comparison of the stress-strain curves of POC, PDC, PDDC,PDDCPEO400, POCM and POC-HA.

FIG. 5 is a graph depicting DSC thermograms of POC

FIG. 6 is a graph depicting the contact angle to water vs. time curve ofPOC.

FIG. 7 is a graph depicting the degradation of POC synthesized underdifferent conditions after incubated in PBS at 37° C. for 6 weeks.

FIG. 8 is a graph depicting weight loss in alkali solution (0.1 M sodiumhydroxide aqueous) of POC with or without 5% (monomer mole ratio)glycerol.

FIG. 9 is a photomicrograph (×100) of human aortic smooth muscle cellson POC at different culture times: A) 1 hour B) 5 hours C) 24 hours andD) 8 days.

FIG. 10 is a graph depicting the results of an MTT-tetrazonium assay ofhuman aortic smooth muscle cells on POC, PLLA (Mw=300,000), and tissueculture polystyrene (TCPS). Formosan absorbance is expressed as afunction of culture time.

FIG. 11 is a photomicrograph (×100) (A,B,C, and D) and SEM pictures (Eand F) of human aortic endothelial cells on POC at different culturetimes: A) 1 hour; B) 24 hours: C) 4 days; D) 6 days; E) and F) 6 days.

FIG. 12 is a photomicrograph (×100) of human aortic smooth muscle cells(A) and human aortic endothelial cells (B) on PDC.

FIG. 13 is a photograph depicting porous and non-porous tube scaffoldand sponge scaffold made by POC.

FIG. 14A and 14B shows graphs depicting the results of wet mechanicaltests for POC and PDDC under different conditions. FIG. 14A showstensile strength and FIG. 14B shows elongation.

FIG. 15 is a schematic drawing depicting a biphasic scaffold.

FIG. 16 shows SEM pictures of A) a cross section of a POC biphasicscaffold; B) the pore structure of the porous phase; C) human aorticsmooth muscles cells on the porous phase of co-cultured biphasicscaffold; D) human aortic endothelial cells on the lumen of co-culturedbiphasic scaffold.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS A. New BiodegradableElastomeric Polymers

Described in the present specification are a family of novelbiodegradable elastomeric polymers comprising a polyester network ofcitric acid copolymerized with a linear aliphatic di-OH monomer in whichthe number of carbon atoms ranges from 2 to 20. Polymer synthesisconditions vary from mild conditions, even at low temperature (less than100° C.) and no vacuum, to tough conditions (high temperature and highvacuum) according the requirements for the materials properties. Bychanging the synthesis conditions (including, but not limited to,post-polymerization temperature, time, vacuum, the initial monomer molarratio, and the di-OH monomer chain length) the mechanical properties ofthe polymer can be modulated over a wide range. This series of polymersexhibit a soft, tough, biodegradable, hydrophilic properties andexcellent biocompatibility in vitro.

The polymers of the present invention have a general structure of:

(A-B-C)_(n)

Where A is a linear, aliphatic diol and C also is a linear aliphaticdiol. B is citric acid. The citric acid co-polymers of the presentinvention are made up of multiples of the above formula, as defined bythe integer n, which may be any integer greater than 1. It iscontemplated that n may range from 1 to about 1000 or more. It isparticularly contemplated that n may be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,29, 30, 31, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,46, 47, 48, 49, 50, or more.

In preferred embodiments, the identity of “A” above is 1,8-octanediol.However, it should be understood that this is merely an exemplarylinear, aliphatic diol. Those of skill are aware of other aliphaticalcohols that will be useful in polycondensation reactions to producepoly citric acid polymers. Exemplary such aliphatic diols include anydiols of between about 2 carbons and about 20 carbons. While the diolsare preferably aliphatic, linear, unsaturated diols, with the hydroxylmoiety being present at the C₁ and C_(x) position (where x is theterminal carbon of the diol), it is contemplated that the diol may be anunsaturated diol in which the aliphatic chain contains one or moredouble bonds. The preferred identity for “C” in one embodiment is 1, 8,octanediol, however as with moiety “A,” “C” may be any other aliphaticalcohols. While in specific embodiments, both A and C are both the samediol, e.g., 1,8-octanediol, it should be understood that A and C mayhave different carbon lengths. For example, A maybe 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or more carbons in length,and C may independently be 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or more carbons in length. Exemplary methods forthe polycondensation of the citric acid with the linear diols areprovided herein below in the Examples.

The polymers of present invention may be utilized to form hybrids withother materials to form elastomeric composites. In those embodimentswhere the other materials are used, the other materials can bein-organic materials, polymers with any kind of forms such as powder,fiber, and films. The other materials can also be elastomeric ornon-elastomeric. In a particularly embodiment, the elastomeric compositecan be a hybrid of the polymers of present invention with hydroxyapatite(POC-HA).

The polymers of the present invention may be useful both as substratafor the growth and propagation of tissues cells that may be seeded onthe substrata and also as implantable devices. In those embodimentswhere the polymers are used as bioimplantable devices, the substrate maybe formulated into a shape suitable for implantation. For example, asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,620,203 (incorporated herein by reference),it may be desirable to produce prosthetic organ tissue for implantationinto an animal, such as e.g., testicular tissue described in the6,620,203 patent. Other organs for which tissue implantation patches maybe generated include, but are not limited to skin tissue for skingrafts, myocardial tissue, bone tissue for bone regeneration, testiculartissue, endothelial cells, blood vessels, and any other cells from whicha tissue patch may be generated. Thus, those of skill in the art wouldunderstand that the aforementioned organs/cells are merely exemplaryorgans/cell types and it should be understood that cells from any organmay be seeded onto the biocompatible polymers of the invention toproduce useful tissue for implantation and/or study.

The cells that may be seeded onto the polymers of the present inventionmay be derived from commercially available cell lines, or alternativelymay be primary cells, which can be isolated from a given tissue bydisaggregating an appropriate organ or tissue which is to serve as thesource of the cells being grown. This may be readily accomplished usingtechniques known to those skilled in the art. Such techniques includedisaggregation through the use of mechanically forces either alone or incombination with digestive enzymes and/or chelating agents that weakencell-cell connections between neighboring cells to make it possible todisperse the tissue into a suspension of individual cells withoutappreciable cell breakage. Enzymatic dissociation can be accomplished bymincing the tissue and treating the minced tissue with any of a numberof digestive enzymes either alone or in combination. Digestive enzymesinclude but are not limited to trypsin, chymotrypsin, collagenase,elastase, and/or hyaluronidase, Dnase, pronase, etc. Mechanicaldisruption can also be accomplished by a number of methods including,but not limited to the use of grinders, blenders, sieves, homogenizers,pressure cells, or sonicators to name but a few. For a review of tissuedisaggregation techniques, see Freshney, Culture of Animal Cells. AManual of Basic Technique, 2d Ed., A. R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1987, Ch.9, pp. 107-126.

Once the primary cells are disaggregated, the cells are separated intoindividual cell types using techniques known to those of skill in theart. For a review of clonal selection and cell separation techniques,see Freshney, Culture of Animal Cells. A Manual of Basic Techniques, 2dEd., A. R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1987, Ch. 11 and 12, pp. 137-168. Mediaand buffer conditions for growth of the cells will depend on the type ofcell and such conditions are known to those of skill in the art.

In certain embodiments, it is contemplated that the cells attached tothe biocompatible polymeric substrates of the invention are grown inbioreactors. A bioreactor may be of any class, size or have any one ornumber of desired features, depending on the product to be achieved.Different types of bioreactors include tank bioreactors, immobilizedcell bioreactors, hollow fiber and membrane bioreactors as well asdigesters. There are three classes of immobilized bioreactors, whichallow cells to be grown: membrane bioreactors, filter or meshbioreactors, and carrier particle systems. Membrane bioreactors grow thecells on or behind a permeable membrane, allowing the nutrients to leavethe cell, while preventing the cells from escaping. Filter or meshbioreactors grow the cells on an open mesh of an inert material,allowing the culture medium to flow past, while preventing the cellsfrom escaping. Carrier particle systems grow the cells on something verysmall, such as small nylon or gelatin beads. The bioreactor can be afluidized bed or a solid bed. Other types of bioreactors include pondreactors and tower fermentors. Any of these bioreactors may be used inthe present application for regenerating/engineering tissues on thecitric acid polymers of the present invention.

Certain tissues that are regenerated by use of the citric acid polymersof the invention may be encapsulated so as to allow the release ofrelease of desired biological materials produced by the cells at thesite of implantation, while sequestering the implanted cells from thesurrounding site. Cell encapsulation can be applied to all cell typessecreting a bioactive substance either naturally or through geneticengineering means. In practice, the main work has been performed withinsulin secreting tissue.

Encapsulation procedures are most commonly distinguished by theirgeometrical appearance, i.e. micro- or macro-capsules. Typically, inmicroencapsulation, the cells are sequestered in a small permselectivespherical container, whereas in macroencapsulation the cells areentrapped in a larger non-spherical membrane, Lim et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos.4,409,331 and 4,352,883) discloses the use of microencapsulation methodsto produce biological materials generated by cells in vitro, wherein thecapsules have varying permeabilities depending upon the biologicalmaterials of interest being produced, Wu et al, Int. J. Pancreatology,3:91-100 (1988), disclose the transplantation of insulin-producing,microencapsulated pancreatic islets into diabetic rats.

As indicated above, the cells that are seeded on the polymers of thepresent invention may be cell lines or primary cells. In certainpreferred embodiments, the cells are genetically engineered cells thathave been modified to express a biologically active or therapeuticallyeffective protein product. Techniques for modifying cells to produce therecombinant expression of such protein products are well known to thoseof skill in the art.

EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of Poly(1,8-Octanediol-Co-Citric acid) (POC)

In a typical experiment, 19.212 g citric acid and 14.623 g Octanediolwere added to a 250 mL three-neck round-bottom flask, fitted with aninlet adapter and an outlet adapter. The mixture was melted within 15min by stirring at 160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, and then thetemperature of the system was lowered to 140° C. The mixture was stirredfor another 1 hr at 140° C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogen was ventedthroughout the above procedures. The pre-polymer was post- polymerizedat 60 ° C., 80° C. or 120° C. with and without vacuum for predeterminedtime (from one day to 3 weeks depending on the temperature, with thelower temperatures requiring longer times) to achieve the Poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citric acid). Nitrogen was introduced into thereaction system before the polymer was taken out from reaction system.

Porous scaffolds of POC (tubular and flat sheets) were prepared via asalt leaching technique. Briefly, sodium chloride salt was ground up andsieved for particle sizes between 90 and 125 microns. The salt particlesare then mixed with the pre-polymer solution to the desired massfraction to obtain a corresponding porosity. Typically, the massfraction of the salt particles will result in a similar % porosity.

EXAMPLE 2 Preparation of Porous scaffolds of POC

Porous scaffolds of POC (tubular and flat sheets) were prepared via asalt leaching technique as follows: POC pre-polymer was dissolved intodioxane to form 25 wt % solution, and then the sieved salt (90-120microns) was added into pre-polymer solution to serve as a porogen. Theresulting slurry was cast into a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) mold(square and tubular shape). After solvent evaporation for 72 h, the moldwas transferred into a vacuum oven for post-polymerization. The salt inthe resulting composite was leached out by successive incubations inwater (produced by Milli-Q water purification system every 12 h for atotal 96 h. The resulting porous scaffold was air-dried for 24 hr andthen vacuum dried for another 24 hrs. The resulting scaffold was storedin a dessicator under vacuum before use. Porous scaffolds are typicallypreferred when cells are expected to migrate through a 3-dimensionalspace in order to create a tissue slice. Solid films would be used whena homogenous surface or substrate for cell growth is required such as anendothelial cell monolayer within the lumen of a vascular graft.

EXAMPLE 3 Characterization of POC

The following Example provides details of methods and results ofcharacterization of POC.

Methods

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy measurements. Infraredspectra were recorded on a Biorad FTS40 Fourier transform infraredspectrometer. Sample POC films with thickness of 12-16 microns wereprepared from POC solid samples using a Microtome.

Mechanical Tests. Tensile tests were conducted according to ASTM D412aon an Instron 5544 mechanical tester equipped with 500 N load cell. ThePOC sample size was 26×4×1.5 mm.

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements. Differentialscanning calorimetry thermograms were recorded in the range of −80 to600° C. on a DSC550 (Instrument Specialists Inc.) instrument at aheating rate of 10° C./min.

In vitro degradation. The disk specimen (7 mm in diameter, about 1 to1.5 mm thickness) was placed in a small container containing 10 mlphosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4). The container was incubated at 37° C.for various times. After incubation the disk was washed with water anddried under vacuum for one week. The mass loss was calculated bycomparing the initial mass (W 0) with that a given time point (WJ), asshown in Eq. (1). Three individual experiments were performed intriplicate for the degradation test. The results are presented as means:1:: standard deviation (n=3).

Mass loss (%)=[(Wo−W.)/Wo]×100  (1)

Alkali hydrolysis. Alkali hydrolysis of the disk specimen (8.5 mm indiameter, about 1 to 1.5 mm thickness) was conducted in a 0.1 M sodiumhydroxide aqueous solution at 37° C. for various times. The degree ofdegradation was estimated from the weight loss expressed as g/m2, whichwas calculated by dividing the weight loss by the total surface area ofthe disk.

Cell culture. Human aortic smooth muscle and endothelial cells(Clonetics) were cultured in a 50 ml culture flask with SmGM-2 and EBM-2culture medium (Clonetics). Cell culture was maintained in awater-jacket incubator equilibrated with 5% CO2 at 37° C. When the cellshad grown to confluence, the cells were passaged using a SubcultureReagent Kit (Clonetics). Polymer films were cut into small pieces (1×2cm1 and placed in cell culture dishes (6 cm in diameter). Polymer filmswere sterilized in 70% ethanol and the ethanol was exchanged with anexcess amount of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The PBS was removedwith a pipette and then the samples were sterilized UV light for another30 min. A 5 ml cell suspension with 6.6×10⁴/ml was added to the culturedish. The morphology of cell attachment was observed and photographedwith an inverted light microscope (Nikon Eclipse, TE2000-U) equippedwith a Photometrics CooISNAP HQ after culturing a predetermined time.After reaching confluence, the samples were fixed by 2.5% glutaraldehydesolution and dehydrated sequentially in 50, 70, 95 and 100% ethanol eachfor 10 min. The fixed samples were lyophilized, sputter-coated with goldand examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi 3500N).Polymer films were cut into small disks (7 mm in diameter) with the aidof a cork borer in order to locate the disks into a 96-well tissueculture plate. PLLA films and Tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) wereused as control. The samples were sterilized as described above. Thehuman aortic smooth muscle cells (3.13×10³/well) were added to thewells. The viability and proliferation of the cells were determined byMTT assays. The absorbance of produced Formosan was measured at 570 nmusing microplate reader (Tecan, SAFFIRE).

Results

Polycondensation of citric acid and 1,8-octanediol yields a transparentfilm. The resulting polymer features a small number of crosslinks andcarboxyl and hydroxyl groups directly attached to the polymer backbone(FIG. 1).

The typical FTIR spectrum of a POC preparation is shown in FIG. 2. Theintense C═O stretch at 1,735 cm-1 in FTIR spectrum confirms theformation of ester bonds. The intense OH stretch at 3,464 cm-1 indicatesthat the hydroxyl groups are hydrogen bonded.

Tensile tests on strips of POC prepared under different syntheticconditions reveal a stress-strain curve characteristic of an elastomericand tough material (FIG. 3). The nonlinear shape of the tensilestress-strain curve, low modulus and large elongation ratio is typicalfor elastomers and resembles those of ligament and vulcanized rubber[4]. These results further demonstrate that when the post-polymerizationreaction is carried out under lower temperature, the resulting polymeris more elastic than when it is performed at higher temperatures. Postpolymerization at lower temperature under vacuum (i.e. 40° C.)) mayenable incorporation of biological molecules within POC withoutsignificant loss of biological activity. Tissue engineering applicationsthat require significant elasticity and strength such as for vasculargrafts and heart valves may benefit from post-polymerization at thelower conditions. Tissue engineering applications that require a morerigid or stiff scaffold such as cartilage tissue engineering wouldbenefit from post-polymerization at the higher temperatures.

The thermal properties of POC were investigated by DSC. From thethermograms depicted in FIG. 5, no crystallization temperature andmelting temperature are observed and apparent glass transitiontemperature (Tg) is observed below 0° C. for POC synthesized under avariety of conditions. This result shows POC is totally amorphous at 37°C. similar to the vulcanized rubber. FIG. 5 shows the Tg changes withthe synthesis conditions. Increasing post-polymerization temperature andelongating the treating time can increase the crosslinking density andthen result in the increase of Tg. The Tg is still significantly below37° C., making the material elastomeric for tissue engineeringapplications that require elastomeric scaffolds (i.e. cardiovascular,pulmonary, ligament tissue engineering). This result also confirms thatPOC is a cross-linked polymer. Similar results were observed with PDC.

FIG. 6 shows the contact angle to water vs. time curve of POC. Theinitial contact angle of the POC synthesized under different conditionsis 76° and 84°, respectively. The water drop spread out with the time.The contact angles finally reach 38° and 44°, respectively. Although theinitial contact angle is relatively high, the polymer chains are highlymobile since POC is a rubber-like and amorphous polymer at roomtemperature, and the polar water molecules can induce the polar groupssuch as hydroxyl and carboxyl to enrich at the polymer surface viasurface rearrangement. The results show POC is a hydrophilic polymer.Hydrophilic polymers are expected to promote endothelial cell adhesionand proliferation as presented in preliminary data.

FIG. 7 shows the degradation of POC synthesized under differentconditions after incubation in PBS at 37° C. for 6 weeks. POCsynthesized under mild conditions (A) has a faster degradation ratecompared to that of POC synthesized under relatively tougher conditions(B and C). The degradation rate of POC (B) is considerably faster thanthat of POC (C). POC synthesized under tough conditions features a highcross-linking degree and the penetration of water molecules into thenetwork films is difficult because of the smaller network space. This isthe reason why the degradation rate sequence is POC (A)>POC (B)>POC (C).These results show that POC is degradable polymer. The degradation ratecan be modulated by changing synthesis conditions.

In order to achieve better control for the degradation of “highlycross-linked” POC, a third monomer, glycerol is added in addition to thecitric acid and diol monomer (0-3 mol %, the molar ratio of carboxyl andhydroxyl group among the three monomers was maintained as 1/1).Increasing amounts of glycerol will result in an increased breakstrength and Young's modulus. The alkali hydrolysis results show thatthe addition of glycerol can enhance the degradation of POC in alkalisolution. Glycerol is a hydrophilic component. Its addition canfacilitate the water penetration into the network films which results inthe faster degradation rate.

The in vitro biocompatibility of POC was evaluated in order toinvestigate the potential application in tissue engineering, especiallyfor soft tissue engineering such as vascular graft, ligament, bladder,and cartilage. Human smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells arechosen as model cells. FIGS. 9 and 11 show the morphology of both celltypes on POC films at different culture times. The results indicate thatPOC is a good substrate for supporting the both cells attachment. Bothcells grow promptly and achieve confluence on POC.

Cell attachment and growth are also observed on PDC (FIG. 12). MTTassays (an indicator of cell viability) also indicate that POC is abetter substrate for cell growth than PLLA (FIG. 10). Syntheticmaterials have attracted many interests as small diameter grafts.Normally, the synthetic grafts have not produced acceptable resultsbecause of rapid thrombotic buildup in the vessel lumen [13].Researchers have been attempting to improve graft performance by addingan endothelial lining and thus better mimicking the vessels in the body[14,15]. Failure of grafts was associated with subintimal hyperplasiaand a thrombotic surface, possibly resulting in part from lack of aconfluent layer of endothelial cells on the graft lumen. Many methodshave been developed for improving the endothelial cell attachment andgrowth such as immobilizing cell adhesion peptides (GREDVY) on polymersurfaces [16], plasma modification using radio frequency glow discharge[17] and so on. Endothelial cells adherence can be dramaticallyincreased when the grafts are coated with extracellular matrix, plasmaor fibronectin. Unfortunately for graft compatibility, coating withfibronectin increases not only the adhesion of endothelial cells tothose surfaces, but of platelets as well [18]. Optimal adherence hasbeen reported for gas plasma- treated surfaces with hydrophilicity inthe range of 40-60° by Dekker [19] and van Wachem [20]. This effect wasattributed to specific protein adsorption favorable for adhesion,spreading, and proliferation of endothelial cells, and improveddeposition of endothelial matrix proteins. For POC, the hydrophilicityis in the above range, which may help the adsorption of glycoproteins onthe polymer surface. The surface-enriched polar groups such as carboxyland hydroxyl may facilitate the cell attachment and growth [21,22]. Noadditional pre-treatments are needed and the endothelial cellsconfluence on POC films can be achieved in a short time.

EXAMPLE 4 Synthesis of Poly (1,6-Hexanediol-Co-Citric Acid) (PHC)

In a typical experiment, 19.212 g citric acid and 11.817 g1,6-hexanediol were added to a 250 ml three-neck round-bottom flask,fitted with an inlet adapter and an outlet adapter. The mixture wasmelted within 15 min by stirring at 160-165° C. in a silicon oil bath,and then the temperature of the system was lowered to 120° C. Themixture was stirred for half an hour at 120° C. to get the pre-polymer.Nitrogen was vented throughout the above procedures. The pre-polymer waspost-polymerized at 60° C., 80° C. or 120° C. with and without vacuumfor a predetermined time from one day to 3 weeks, depending on thetemperature, to achieve the Poly (1,6-hexanediol-co-citric acid).Nitrogen was introduced into the reaction system before the polymer wastaken out from reaction system.

EXAMPLE 5 Synthesis of Poly (1,10-Decanediol-Co-Citric Acid) (PDC)

In a typical experiment, 19.212 g citric acid and 17.428 g1,10-decanediol were added to a 250 ml three-neck round-bottom flask,fitted with an inlet adapter and an outlet adapter. The mixture wasmelted within 15 min by stirring at 160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, andthen the temperature of the system was lowered to 120° C. The mixturewas stirred for half an hour at 120° C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogenwas vented throughout the above procedures. The pre-polymer waspost-polymerized at 60° C., 80° C. or 120° C. with and without vacuumfor predetermined time from one day to 3 weeks depending on thetemperature to achieve the Poly (1,10-decanediol-co-citric acid).Nitrogen was introduced into the reaction system before the polymer wastaken out from reaction system.

EXAMPLE 6 Synthesis of Poly (1,12-Dodecanediol-Co-Citric Acid) PDDC

In a typical experiment, 19.212 g citric acid and 20.234 g1,12-dodecanediol were added to a 250 ml three-neck round-bottom flask,fitted with an inlet adapter and an outlet adapter. The mixture wasmelted within 15 min by stirring at 160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, andthen the temperature of the system was lowered to 120° C. The mixturewas stirred for half an hour at 120° C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogenwas vented throughout the above procedures. The pre-polymer waspost-polymerized at 60° C., 80° C. or 120° C. with and without vacuumfor predetermined time from one day to 3 weeks depending on thetemperature to achieve the Poly (1,12-dodecanediol-co-citric acid).Nitrogen was introduced into the reaction system before the polymer wastaken out from reaction system.

EXAMPLE 7 Synthesis of Poly(1,8-Octanediol-Co-Citric Acid-Co-Glycerol)

In a typical experiment (Poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citric acid-co-1%glycerol), 23.0544 g citric acid, 16.5154 g 1,8-octanediol and 0.2167 gglycerol were added to a 250 ml three-neck round-bottom flask, fittedwith an inlet adapter and an outlet adapter. The mixture was meltedwithin 15 min by stirring at 160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, and thenthe temperature of the system was lowered to 120° C. The mixture wasstirred for another hour at 140° C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogen wasvented throughout the above procedures. The pre-polymer was post-polymerized at 60° C., 80° C. or 120° C. with and without vacuum forpredetermined time from one day to 3 weeks depending on the temperatureto achieve the Poly (1,8-octanediol-co-citric acid-co- 1% glycerol).Nitrogen was introduced into the reaction system before the polymer wastaken out from reaction system.

EXAMPLE 8 Synthesis of Poly(1,8-Octanediol-Citric Acid-Co-PolyethyleneOxide)

In a typical experiment, 38.424 g citric acid, 14.623 g 1,8-octanedioland 40 g polyethylene oxide with molecular weight 400 (PEO400)(100 gPEO1000 and 200 g PEO2000 respectively) (molar ratio: citricacid/1,8-octanediol /PEO400 =1/0.5/0.5) were added to a 250 ml or 500 mlthree-neck round-bottom flask, fitted with an inlet adapter and anoutlet adapter. The mixture was melted within 15 min by stirring at160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, and then the temperature of the systemwas lowered to 135° C. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours at 135° C. toget the pre-polymer. Nitrogen was vented throughout the aboveprocedures. The pre-polymer was post-polymerized at 120° C. under vacuumfor predetermined time from one day to 3 dyas to achieve thePoly(1,8-octanediol-citric acid-co-polyethylene oxide). Nitrogen wasintroduced into the reaction system before the polymer was taken outfrom reaction system. The molar ratios can be altered to achieve aseries of polymers with different properties.

EXAMPLE 9 Synthesis of Poly(1,12-Dodecanediol-CitricAcid-Co-Polyethylene Oxide)

In a typical experiment, 38.424 g citric acid, 20.234 g1,12-dodecanediol and 40 g polyethylene oxide with molecular weight 400(PEO400)(100 g PEO1000 and 200 g PEO2000 respectively) (molar ratio:citric acid/1,8-octanediol /PEO400=1/0.5/0.5) were added to a 250 ml or500 ml three-neck round-bottom flask, fitted with an inlet adapter andan outlet adapter. The mixture was melted within 15 min by stirring at160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, and then the temperature of the systemwas lowered to 120° C. The mixture was stirred for half an hour at 120°C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogen was vented throughout the aboveprocedures. The pre-polymer was post-polymerized at 120° C. under vacuumfor predetermined time from one day to 3 days to achieve thePoly(1,12-dodecanediol-citric acid-co-polyethylene oxide). Nitrogen wasintroduced into the reaction system before the polymer was taken outfrom reaction system. The molar ratios can be altered to achieve aseries of polymers with different properties.

EXAMPLE 10 Synthesis of Poly(1,8-Octanediol-CitricAcid-Co-N-Methyldiethanoamine) POCM

In a typical experiment, 38.424 g citric acid, 26.321 g 1,8-octanedioland 2.3832 g N-methyldiethanoamine (MDEA) (molar ratio: citricacid/1,8-octanediol /MDEA=1/0.90/0.10) were added to a 250 ml or 500 mlthree-neck round-bottom flask, fitted with an inlet adapter and anoutlet adapter. The mixture was melted within 15 min by stirring at160-165° C. in silicon oil bath, and then the temperature of the systemwas lowered to 13520° C. The mixture was stirred for half an hour at120° C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogen was vented throughout the aboveprocedures. The pre-polymer was post- polymerized at 80° C. for 6 hours,120° C. for 4 hours without vacuum and then 120° C. for 14 hours undervacuum to achieve the Poly(1,8-octanediol-citricacid-co-N-methyldiethanoamine). Nitrogen was introduced into thereaction system before the polymer was taken out from reaction system.The molar ratios can be altered to citric acid/1,8-octanediol/MDEA=1/0.95/0.05.

EXAMPLE 11 Synthesis of Poly(1,12-Dodecanediol-CitricAcid-co-N-Methyldiethanoamine) PDDCM

In a typical experiment, 38.424 g citric acid, 36.421 g1,12-dodecanediol and 2.3832 g N-methyldiethanoamine (MDEA) (molarratio: citric acid/1,8-octanediol /MDEA=1/0.90/0.10) were added to a 250ml or 500 ml three-neck round-bottom flask, fitted with an inlet adapterand an outlet adapter. The mixture was melted within 15 min by stirringat 160-165° C. in a silicon oil bath, and then the temperature of thesystem was lowered to 120° C. The mixture was stirred for half an hourat 120° C. to get the pre-polymer. Nitrogen was vented throughout theabove procedures. The pre-polymer was post- polymerized at 80° C. for 6hours, 120° C. for 4 hours without vacuum and then 120° C. for 14 hoursunder vacuum to achieve the Poly(1,12-dodecanediol-citricacid-co-N-methyldiethanoamine). Nitrogen was introduced into thereaction system before the polymer was taken out from reaction system.The molar ratios can be altered to citric acid/1,12-dodecanediol /MDEA=1/0.95/0.05.

EXAMPLE 12 Calcium Modification Of Different Polymers

In a typical experiment, POC and PDDC films or scaffolds were immersedin a 0.1 M CaCl₂ solution for 1 week, rinsed in mini-Q water and thenfreeze-dried. The dry samples were stored in a desiccator before use. Inorder to evaluate calcium modification on mechanical properties of POCand PDDC, POC and PDDC was tested under different treating conditions.

Mechanical test results show that calcium under wet conditions, calciumtreatment (1 week) may help to maintain appropriate tensile stress forPOC compared to PBS 1 week of treatment with phosphate buffered saline(PBS). Calcium treatment has dramatic effects on elongation for POC.After 1 week of calcium treatment, POC can maintain a similar elongationrate compared to 1 week of PBS (phosphate buffer solution) 1 weektreatment. Even after 1 more week of PBS treatment following 1 week ofcalcium treatment, the height elongation rate of POC can be stillmaintained. Since PDDC is more hydrophobic than POC, the effects ofcalcium treatment on tensile stress and elongation of PDDC is less thanthat on POC. This results show that calcium ions chelated by unreactedcarboxyl group of POC and PDDC synthesized under mild condition (80° C.2 days) act as crosslinkers to help to maintain the elasticity andappropriate strength of polymers (FIG. 14).

EXAMPLE 13 Synthesis of POC-Hydroxyapatite (HA) Composite

In a typical experiment, 19.212 g citric acid and 14.623 g Octanediol(molar ratio 1:1) of Citric Acid and 1,8-octanediol was reacted in a 250ml three-neck round-bottom flask at 165° C, forming a pre-polymersolution. Specific amount of HA was then added to reaction vessel whilestirring with a mechanical stirrer. Acetone was then added untilsolution liqueified into a slurry state. Solution was then cast into aTeflon mold and set in a vacuum oven at 120° C. for 2-4 hours or untilthe acetone was purged. Film was then incubated without vacuum at 120°C. overnight allowing the solution to set. Film could then be postpolymerized for various durations depending upon the desired properties.Mechanical tests on POC-HA (40 wt %) shows tensile stress is as high as10.13±0.57 MPa and elongation is 47.78±3.00. Specimen recoverycompletely after pulling by mechanical tester.

EXAMPLE 14 Comparison of the Properties of Different Polymers

FIG. 4 shows that the mechanical properties of the polymer can bemodulated by choosing different diol monomers. The maximum elongationratio for the polymer at break can reach 265:1:10.5% similar to that ofarteries and vein (up to 260%) [10]. The minimum tensile Young's moduluscan reach 1.4:1:0.2 MPa. The Young's modulus is between those ofligament (KPa scale) [11] and tendon (GPa scale) [12].

Similar to the vulcanized rubber, POC, PDC, and PDDC are thermosetelastomers. In general, thermoset polymers can not be dissolved incommon solvents which adds to the difficulty in making the polymer intoa scaffold for tissue engineering applications. The present applicationdescribes a method to fabricate porous and non-porous scaffolds whichmakes it possible to be used in tissue engineering utilizing thesolubility of the pre-polymer in some solvent such as dioxane, acetone,1,3-dioxlane, ethanol, N,N-dimethylformamide. Therefore, this family ofpolymers is a potential elastomer in tissue engineering especially insoft tissue engineering.

EXAMPLE 15 Further Characterization of Solid Polymeric Materials.

This example is directed to the extent of cross-linking of the polymericmaterials. Current methods to determine the molecular weight of apolymer include osmotic pressure, light scattering, ultracentrifugation,solution viscosity, and gel permeation chromatography measurements. Allof these methods normally require a polymer that can be dissolved inspecific solvents.^([24]) Crosslinked polymers can not be dissolved in asolvent and their molecular weight is considered to be infinite.However, a useful parameter to characterize cross-linked polymers ismolecular weight between cross-links (Mc), which can give a measure ofthe degree of cross-linking and therefore some insight into mechanicalproperties. According the theory of rubber elasticity, molecular weightbetween crosslinks can be calculated using Equation (1) under someassumptions: [^(25])

$\begin{matrix}{n = {\frac{E_{0}}{3\; {RT}} = \frac{\rho}{M_{c}}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

where n represents the number of active network chain segments per unitvolume; Mc represents the molecular weight between cross-links (mol/m³);E₀ represents Young's modulus (Pa); R is the universal gas constant(8.3144 J·mol−1·K−1); T is the absolute temperature (K); ρ is theelastomer density (g/m³) as measured via volume method. ^([26]) FromEquation (1), molecular weight between crosslinks can only be obtainedafter mechanical tests and polymer density measurements. Another methodfor determining molecular weight between crosslinks for a crosslinkedpolymer is by swelling the polymer. ^([27]) Using the swelling method,molecular weight between crosslinks can be calculated by Equation (2).

$\begin{matrix}{\frac{1}{M_{c}} = {\frac{2}{M_{n}} - \frac{\frac{\upsilon}{V_{1}}\left\lbrack {{\ln \left( {1 - \upsilon_{2,s}} \right)} + \upsilon_{2,s} + {\chi_{1}\upsilon_{2,s}^{2}}} \right\rbrack}{\upsilon_{2,s}^{1/3} - \frac{\upsilon_{2,s}}{2}}}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

where Mc is the number average molecular weight of the linear polymerchain between cross-links, ν is the specific volume of the polymer, V₁is the molar volume of the swelling agent and χ₁ is the Flory-Hugginspolymer-solvent interaction parameter. ν_(2s) s is the equilibriumpolymer volume fraction which can be calculated from a series of weightmeasurements.

EXAMPLE 16 Novel Biphasic Scaffold Design for Blood Vessel TissueEngineering

Biphasic scaffolds consist of outside porous phase and inside non-porousphase as depicted in the schematic drawing shown in FIG. 15. Thenon-porous phase is expected to provide a continuous surface for ECadhesion and spreading, mechanical strength, and elasticity to thescaffold. The porous phase will facilitate the 3-D growth of smoothmuscle cells. Biphasic scaffolds were fabricated via followingprocedures. Briefly, glass rods (˜3 mm diameter) were coated with thepre-polymer solution and air dried to allow for solvent evaporation.Wall thickness of the tubes can be controlled by the number of coatingsand the percent pre-polymer in the solution. The pre-coated pre-polymerwas partially post-polymerized under 60° C. for 24 hr; thepre-polymer-coated glass rod is then inserted concentrically in atubular mold that contains a salt/pre-polymer slurry. Thepre-polymer/outer-mold/glass rod system is then placed in an oven forfurther post-polymerization. After salt-leaching [4], the biphasicscaffold was then de-molded from the glass rod and freeze dried. Theresulting biphasic scaffold was stored in a desiccator before use. Thesame materials or different materials from the above family of elatomerscan be utilized for both phases of the scaffold. Other biomedicalmaterials widely used in current research and clinical application suchas polylactide (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactide-co-glycolide)(PLGA) may also be utilized for this novel scaffold design.

The thickness, degradation, and mechanical properties of insidenon-porous phase can be well controlled by choosing various pre-polymersof this family of elastomers, pre-polymer concentration, coating timesand post-polymerization conditions (burst pressure can be as high as2800 mmHg). The degradable porous phase and non-porous phases areintegrated since they are formed in-situ via post-polymerization. Thecell culture experiments shown in FIG. 16 confirm that both HAEC andHASMC can attach and grow well in biphasic scaffolds. The resultssuggest that a biphasic scaffold design based on poly(diol-co-citrate)is a viable strategy towards the engineering of small diameter bloodvessels.

EXAMPLE 17 Materials and Methods Employed for Polymer Characterization

In addition to the materials and methods described above, the followingmaterials and methods also are exemplary of the studies performedherein.

Polymer Synthesis

Preparation of poly(1,8-Octanediol-co-citric acid) (POC) films: [23] Allchemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, Wis.). Equimolaramounts of citric acid and 1,8-octanediol were added to a 250 mlthree-neck round-bottom flask, fitted with an inlet and outlet adapter.The mixture was melted under a flow of nitrogen gas by stirring at 160°C.-165° C. in a silicon oil bath, and then the temperature of the systemwas lowered to 140° C. The mixture was stirred for another hour at 140°C. to create the pre-polymer solution. The pre-polymer was cast in glassdishes and post-polymerized at 80° C., 120° C. or 140° C. under vacuum(2 Pa) or no vacuum for times ranging from 1 day to 2 weeks to createPOC films with various degrees of cross-linking.

Mechanical Tests

Tensile tests were conducted according to ASTM D412a on an Instron 5544mechanical tester equipped with 500 N load cell (Instron Canton, MA).Briefly, a dog-bone-shaped sample (26×4×1.5 mm, Length×Width×Thickness)was pulled at a rate of 500 mm/min. Values were converted tostress-strain and a Young's modulus was calculated. 4-6 samples weremeasured and averaged. Molecular weight between crosslinks measurementsThe molecular weight between crosslinks of POC was calculated usingEquation (1).

Swelling Studies

Polymers were cut into rectangular strip and the initial length, widthand thickness measured with calipers. The polymers were then swollen inDMSO at 37° C. overnight to achieve equilibrium swelling. Theequilibrium length, width, and thickness were measured to determine thechange in volume upon swelling.

Results and Discussion Mechanical Tests and Molecular WeightMeasurements of POC

POC samples of various degrees of cross-linking were synthesized byreacting the polyfunctional monomer citric acid with the difinctionalmonomer 1,8-octanediol under different post-polymerization conditionsand the resulting polymer films were subjected to mechanical tensiletests and molecular weight between crosslinks measurements. ^([)25] Theresults in Table 1 indicate that increased crosslinking temperatures andtime increase the tensile stress, Young's modulus and the number ofactive network chain segment per unit volume (crosslinking density)while decreasing the molecular weight between crosslinks. Therefore, themechanical properties of POC can be well controlled by controllingpolymer network structures via post-polymerization under differentconditions.

TABLE 1 Mechanical properties, the number of active network chainsegment per unit volume (crosslinking density): n) and molecular weightbetween crosslinks (Mc) of POC synthesized under different conditionsTensile Young's Stress n Mc POC Polymerization condition Modulus (MPa)(MPa) (mol/m³) (g/mol) LS1 80° C., no vacuum, 2 days 1.38 ± 0.21 1.64 ±0.05 182.59 ± 27.78 6874 ± 148 LS2 80° C., high vacuum, 2 days 1.72 ±0.45 1.90 ± 0.22 227.58 ± 59.54 5445 ± 116 LS3 120° C., high vacuum, 1day 2.84 ± 0.12 3.62 ± 0.32 375.77 ± 15.88 3301 ± 218 LS4 120° C., highvacuum, 2 days 3.13 ± 0.27 3.66 ± 0.61 414.14 ± 35.72 2971 ± 76 LS5 120°C., high vacuum, 3 days 4.69 ± 0.48 5.34 ± 0.66 620.68 ± 63.51 1857 ± 81LS6 140° C., high vacuum, 2 days 6.07 ± 0.52 5.73 ± 1.39 803.14 ± 68.801516 ± 269 LS7 80° C., no vacuum, 5 days 2.21 ± 0.17 3.90 ± 0.60 292.41± 22.49 4326 ± 68 LS8 80° C., no vacuum, 14 days 2.24 ± 0.09 2.55 ± 0.21296.38 ± 11.91 4265 ± 33

REFERENCES

-   [1] Langer R, Vacanti I P. Tissue engineering. Science 1993,260:920-   [2] Griffith L G. Polymeric biomaterials. Acta Mater.    2000,48:263-277-   [3] Guldberg R E. Consideration of mechanical factors. Ann. N. Y.    Acad. Sci. 2002;961:312- 314.-   [4] Wang Y D, Ameer G A, Sheppard B I, Langer R. Nature    Biotechnology, 2002;20:602-606.-   [5] Greenwald S E, Berry CL. I. Pathol. 2000;190:292-299.-   [6] Xue L, Greisler H P I. Vas. Surg.2003;37:472-480.-   [7] Kim B S, Putnam A J, Kulik T I, Mooney D I. Biotechnol. Bioeng.    1998;57:46-54.-   [8] Ziegler T, Nerem R M. I. Cell. Biochem. 1994;56:204-209.-   [9] K weon H Y, Yoo M K, Park I K, Kim T H, Lee H C, Lee H S, Oh I    S, Akaike T, Cho C S. Biomaterials 2003;24:801- 808.-   [10] Lee M C, Haut R C. I. Biomech. 1992;25 :925-927.-   [11] Chiba M, Komatsu K. I. Biomech. 1993;26:561-570.-   [12] Misof K, Rapp G, Fmtzi P A. Biophys. I. 1997;72:1376-1381.-   [13] Camagey I, Hem-Anderson D, Ranieri I, Schmidt C E. I. Biomed.    Mater. Res. Part B: Appl Biomater 2003;65B:171-179.-   [14] Consigny P M. Long Term Eff Med Implants 2000;10:79-95.-   [15] Bordenave L, Remy-Zolghadri M, Femandez P, Bareille R, Midy D.    Endothelium 1999;6:267-275.-   [16] Hubbell I A, Massia S P, Desai N P, Drumheller PD.    Biotechnology 1991;9:568-572.-   [17] Greisler H P , Chatelier R C, Gengenbach T R, Johnson G, Steele    I G. Biomater Sci Polymer Ed. 1994;5 :531-554.-   [18] Bos G W, Poot A A, Beugeling T, van Aken W G, Feijen I.    Archieve of Physiology and Biochemistry 1998; 106: 100-115.-   [19] Dekker A, Reitsma K. Beugeling T, Feijen I, van Aken W G.    Biomaterials 1991;12:130-138.-   [20] van Wachem P B, Beugeling T, Feijen I, Biomaterials    1985;6:403-408.-   [21] Yang J, Bei J Z, Wang S G. Biomaterials, 2002;23:2607-2614.-   [22] Yang J, Shi G X, Bei J Z, Wang S G, Cao Y L, Shang Q X, Yang G    H, Wang W J. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002,62(3):438.446.-   [23] J. Yang, A. R. Webb, G. A. Ameer. Advanced Materials 2004; in    press:-   [24] F. W. L. Harry R. Allcock,e. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.    1990.-   [25] L. H. Sperling,e. New York: John Wiley & Sons.1992.-   [26] J. Yang, G. X. Shi, J. Z. Bei, S. G. Wang, Y. L. Cao, Q. X.    Shang, G. H. Yang, W. J. Wang. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002; 62: 438.-   [27] L. J. Suggs, E. Y. Kao, L. L. Palombo, R. S. Krishnan, M. S.    Widmer, A. G. Mikos, in Polymers for Tissue Engineering, (Eds:    H.A.H. M. S. Shoichet). Utrecht: VSP. 1998 p. 99.-   [28] H. G. Barth,e. New York: Wiley Interscience.1984.-   [29] G. Gouesbet, G. Grehan,e. New York: Plenum Press.1988.-   [30] B. Chu,e. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.1991.-   [31] Y. A. Akpalu, Y. Lin. Journal of Polymer Science: Part B:    Polymer Physics 2002; 40:2714.-   [32] M. S. Lisowski, Q. Liu, J. Cho, J. Runt, F. Yeh, B. S. Hsiao.    Macromolecules 2000; 33: 4842.-   [33] J. H. v. Zanten, H. G. Monbouquette. Journal of Colloid and    Interface Science 1994; 165.-   [34] M. Siddiq, C. Wu, B. Li. Journal of Applied Polymer Science    1996; 60: 1995.-   [35] Y. L. Kim, Y. Liu, R. K. Wali, H. K. Roy, M. J. Goldberg, A. K.    Kromine, K. Chen, V. Backman. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Elect. 2003;    9: 243.-   [36] Y. D. Wang, G. A. Ameer, B. J. Sheppard, R. Langer. Nature    Biotechnology 2002; 20: 602.-   [37] U. W. Gedde,e. 1st ed. New York: Chapman & Hall.1995.-   [38] N. A. Peppas, B. D. Barr, in Hydrogels in Medicine and    Pharmacy, (Eds: N.A. Peppas). CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. 1988 p. 27.-   [39] J. R. Vega, L. M. Gugliotta, V. D. G. Gonzalez, G. R. Meira.    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2003; 261: 74.-   [40] M. Barlett, H. Jiang. Physical Review E. Statistical Physics,    Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics 2002; 65:    031906/1.-   [41] E. Szuromi, M. Berka, J. Borbaly. Macromolecules 2000; 33:    3993.

1. (canceled)
 2. (canceled)
 3. (canceled)
 4. (canceled)
 5. (canceled) 6.(canceled)
 7. (canceled)
 8. A substrate for use in tissue engineeringcomprising a citric acid polymer of claim 15 formulated into a cellculture substrate.
 9. The substrate of claim 15, wherein said substratefurther comprises a surface modification.
 10. The substrate of claim 15,wherein said polymer is biodegradeable.
 11. A method of producingengineered tissue, comprising: a. providing a biodegradable citric acidpolymer of any of claim 15; and b. culturing cells of said tissue on thescaffold of part (a).
 12. (canceled)
 13. The method of claim 11, whereinsaid cells are selected from the group consisting of endothelial cells,ligament tissue, muscle cells, bone cells, cartilage cells.
 14. Themethod of claim 11, wherein said engineered tissue is produced in abioreactor.
 15. A citric acid polyester comprising a reaction product ofmonomers A, B, and C, wherein A is a linear aliphatic dihydroxy monomer,B is citric acid, and C is a linear aliphatic dihydroxy monomer, and Aand C are different linear diols, and the polyester comprises four ormore citric acid monomers.
 16. The polyester of claim 15, wherein A andC are each a linear diol comprising between about 2 and about 20carbons.
 17. The polyester of claim 15, wherein A is 1,8-octanediol. 18.The polyester of claim 17, when B comprises 1,10-decanediol,tetradeca-2,12-diene- 1,14-diol, a polyethylene oxide,N-methyldiethanolamine, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,12-dodecanediol, or mixturesthereof.
 19. The polyester of claim 18 further comprising glycerol.